Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4712 13
Original file (NR4712 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

CRS
Docket No: 4712-13
9 May 2014

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 February 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in

support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was

insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on
16 October 2006. On 27 September 2007 you were diagnosed with
left knee plica syndrome. You were separated with an honorable
discharge on 31 October 2007, by reason of disability with
severance pay. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-3P, as
permitted by governing directives.

An RE-3P reentry code is the most favorable code authorized by
regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to disability
with severance pay. The Board thus concluded that there is no
error or injustice in your reentry code. Accordingly, your
~~

 

application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and ©
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

, Consequently, when. applying for a correction of an official

_Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the

existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Sas > a
‘ROBERT D.

Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5642 13

    Original file (NR5642 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ({onsequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03449-11

    Original file (03449-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2012. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly assigned the RE-3P reentry code due to your diagnosed physical disability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8415 13

    Original file (NR8415 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of condition, not a disability, during initial training. : Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2431-13

    Original file (NR2431-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01563-09

    Original file (01563-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That code should not preclude your reentry into the Armed Forces as it may be waived, particularly in a case such as yours, where you no longer experience disabling shortness of breath. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0634 14

    Original file (NR0634 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of condition not a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8639 13

    Original file (NR8639 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9447 13

    Original file (NR9447 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of condition, not a disability, during initial training. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official jnpaval record, he burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2723 14

    Original file (NR2723 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Marines discharged by reason of a medical condition normally are assigned an RE-3P reentry code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08121-10

    Original file (08121-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2010. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-3P, which is the most favorable code authorized for a Marine discharged by reason of physical disability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.